Peter Alcibiades wrote:
1)  it needs to run Rev exactly as the developers expect.

So, if revPrintField and multiple desktops are not supported, they should
not work on the reference distribution, and the release notes should say
so.  Or, if they are, the release notes should say so, and they should work
on the reference distribution.  Rev Browser as well!

revPrintField: What is the nature of the problem with that command on Linux? I searched for those terms in the RQCC and came up empty - what's the RQCC #? I wonder if it's something we may be able to fix ourselves, and deliver the fix to RR.

revBrowser: This seems merely a question of resource allocation, but being an external it seems likely something that could be farmed out if there was money available to do so. A couple of us have expressed interest in helping to fund such an effort - any others willing to chip in? I have no idea of the cost, but I'd guess it'd be at least $1k; between myself and my clients we may be able to justify a few hundred, which won't cover it all but if others can come on board with contributions this may well be doable at no cost to RR and therefore no delay to ourselves.

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World
 Rev training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
 Webzine for Rev developers: http://www.revjournal.com
 revJournal blog: http://revjournal.com/blog.irv
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to