In your case, Curry, you might want to add an (optional?) parameter that specifies the data set. Add a programming style in that the data set name is the handler name.
I wonder what value should be returned for Curry's callingHandler if it is a function or an event or a message.
Yeah, I was about to add a parameter like that, then I decided to double-check that this type of feature hadn't been added to 2.0, because something along these lines had been discussed a while bac. So I decided to suggest it again.
I would say the callingHandler could return just the handler name and if we need the object, it would be good to have a separate function like the callingObject, or callingControl, or what the heck, as Richard said the callerID!
Curry _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
