There has been much debate in this thread, including presumption of what the folks at RunRev would feel or should feel is important. But please note that the RunRev folks have not spoken for themselves on this yet one way or another. We could continue this conjecture, or we could pursue results:
The use-rev list is primarily for user-to-user assistance. Feature requests are normally channelled through the improve-rev list. As with any other feature request, just propose a spec for how you would like to access ActiveX components to that list and watch what happens.... The spec proposal is an important ingredient of a useful feature request. It may or may not be implemented as initially proposed, but the ensuing discussion will refine things for the greatest benefit for the greatest number of users. With an ActiveX proposal, one of the core issues will affect many of us: assigning data types. This is not a trivial issue in a typeless 4GL, so it will take some thought (although ToolBook's sybtax provides a useful starting point). -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation Developer of WebMerge 2.2: Publish any database on any site ___________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com Tel: 323-225-3717 AIM: FourthWorldInc _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
