Mike, 'scool, thanks.

Brian, I agree, great project for math and coding.  Sometimes it's an 
enlightening exercise to take an existing capability and code it oneself or to 
extend it.  For instance, I have written routines to do "infinite" precision 
integer arithmetic (working on an "infinite" precision calculator), to do a 
sortof baseConvert, but which will accept decimals or fractions and bases 
larger than 36, intermediately large (10^12+) prime factorization and at one 
time in I wrote some routines to mimic trig functions.  As far as sqrt, back in 
the old days when I was in high school, we learned to extract those by hand ... 
you, too?  



>From: Michael Kann <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: Project Euler
>To: How to use Revolution <[email protected]>
>Message-ID: <[email protected]> 
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
>Mick, 
>
>You beat me to it on the Fibonacci series. I also thought about using the 
>golden ratio. Using a few other relationships allows one to compose a rather 
>compact script.
>
>1. the F numbers are always odd odd even, odd odd even
>is
>--- before four million
>
>2. F1 + F2 + F3 . . . Fn = F(n+2)- 1
>
>--- this allows you to do the summation at the end
>--- If you know Fn then you just go up a couple more
>--- numbers to get the sum of the first n numbers
>
>3. If you stop the summation at F(even) then the sum of
>   the even numbers will be 1/2 of the total sum
>
>-- 1,1,TWO,3,5,EIGHT,13,21,THIRTY-FOUR
>-- The two numbers sum to the EVENS (by definition)
>
>----Here's the script -- 555 is just any large number
>
>on mouseUp
>put (1+ sqrt(5))/2 into g
>repeat with n = 0 to 555 step 3
>   if (g^n)/sqrt(5) > 4E6 then exit repeat 
>end repeat 
>put (round((g^(n-1))/sqrt(5)) - 1) / 2 
>end mouseUp 
>-------------------------------------
>The golden ratio technique is most valuable if you want to hit a very large F 
>number. You don't have to count up to it. It is like random access memory.
>
>
>
>Here's another interesting property of a F series:
>
>1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21
>
>Take the square of 8 -- 64. It is off by one from the product 5*13. That holds 
>for any 3 numbers in a row. Sometimes the square is one more than the products 
>of its neighbors, sometimes one less: but always one off.  
>
>
**********************************************
>Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:27:38 -0500
>From: Brian Yennie <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: Project Euler
>To: How to use Revolution <[email protected]>
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>Good stuff! I particularly like this project, because it allows for a 
>combination of clever coding AND pure math. The best problems surely require 
>both. It also depends what "level" of computation you force yourself to 
>contain in you code. For example, Rev has a sqrt() function, but what if you 
>had to write this code without that function built in? Would that lead to a 
>whole different approach? Is it ok to use known formulas, or does your code 
>have to derive them itself? Etc.
>
>With that said, it would be pretty darn cool if we got a near-complete set of 
>solutions all written in Rev... what a nice reference for tight mathematical 
>coding.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to