Brian- Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 7:13:33 PM, you wrote:
> All perform about twice as fast as using "repeat for each". The > first was about 10% faster than the next two, which makes sense as > it would only be one seek and one copy. The in-place operations > would require a seek, a copy, and resizing the original variable. Of > course if you end up copying back to the original variable > somewhere, it should be very close to the same. Can you post your benchmark code? I'm currently seeing 5ms for the copy-in-place deletion function vs a bit over 100ms for "delete line -1" or "delete last line" for 5000 runs. -- -Mark Wieder [email protected] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
