On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:10:08 -0400, Colin Holgate wrote:

> 
> The other tool maker communities are arguing similarly, that if it came down 
> to it the tool could export an XCode project (like Unity does), and you do 
> the final compile from that Objective-C code,
> Unfortunately, the wording is very clear, that the app needs to be 
> "originally" programmed in Objective-C, and not that it can be Objective-C 
> just at the end. It also says there can't be links to the APIs through an 
> intermediate translation layer. In a sense that's what the revMobile plugin 
> is doing, as a pre-process, not a runtime one.
> 


> the wording is very clear, that the app needs to be "originally" programmed 
> in Objective-C,

I'm curious how is Apple going to enforce this?. Let's say somebody used third 
party tool to write the code in X language which tool translated to perfect 
Xcode project.
So, how Apple would know how Xcode project was actually written?

regards
Tariel
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to