On 12/04/2010 23:17, Andre Garzia wrote:
Fill an enhancement request on the QA Site and I will vote for it!
:D
I'm missing something: I know the QC (= Quality Control) centre, but I don't
know the QA centre . . .
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Richmond Mathewson<
[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/04/2010 22:17, Andre Garzia wrote:
Richmond,
You can't do that with Rev... In Rev all elements inherit the stacks own
blendlevel :-(
Blast!
If you are not moving your stack, you can take a screenshot of the screen,
crop it, set it as background of the stack with a clever image with a
blend,
then it will look like the effect you're trying to achieve but if the
window
moves, the background will not move with it...
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Richmond Mathewson<
[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/04/2010 20:30, stephen barncard wrote:
<snip>
Anyway, a facsimile of the Quick Look window shouldn't be that hard to
do
with 4.0's graphic effects.
>Wow; Cowabunga!
http://andregarzia.on-rev.com/richmond/STUFF/FREAKY.rev.zip
well, it took this "genius" about 3 minutes (and that is because he's
slow!).
I have just uploaded a new version of this which shows up a slight
problem:
while it is a breeze to set the blend of a stack to, say, 50%; there is
no
way
that I can find to stop objects in the stack from inheriting that blend
value.
My stack contains an image "DEVO" which I would like to have a blend
value
of 0; and it does; but, because it inherits the blend value of the stack
that
is overridden and the image is still partly transparent.
I think that those smoky, grey (whoops; "gray"), semi-transparent windows
in Mac are really very sexy; but they would be a lot sexier if they could
be
used to contain/present fully opaque objects (such as images).
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
