On 26/apr/2010, at 15.13, Andre.Bisseret wrote: > A while later, trying to comment it, I discovered that it was working without > any wait as well!!! > I must confess that I am unable to explain why. > > I must add that the data grid I am using for trials has only 9 rows (3 dates > with 3 names each)! could be the wait is necessary with much more rows(?) > > As it is working for me with or without "wait", I can't test; but you might > try a far less long delay in the wait to get it unnoticeable!: something like > "wait 1" (means 1 tick). Seems I have read somewhere that even "wait 0" could > works as it forces the two commands to be strickly successive.
I used a wait 100 millisec for a datagrid with 500 rows. Probably it is related with the number of rows a datagrid has... Thank you very much again! Best Regards Marcello _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
