Le 6 mai 2010 à 21:06, Randall Reetz a écrit : > This is an interesting Supreme Court subject. I could write a tight case > that shows that code is content. An executable program is first amendment > protected expressive content exactly the same as is expected and enjoyed by a > poet or a painter.
Ahh... good.... I see the possibility of a Godwin point.... > > So, build an ipad and iphone stack runner (using Apple's blessed IDE) and be > done with it. Then the question is how to distribute runrev generated stacks > for the iphad? > > After that, the question is: Does apple restrict the distribution of ebooks, > movies, sounds or other content as a function of origin, protocol, or content? > > If so, they will eventually face the courts on that issue for sure. Anyone > know what the civil liberties people are doing with regard to this topic? It > is one thing to be a media broadcaster or a content source, but to be that > and the proprietor of the only equipment through with that same content can > be consumed, wow, that is so beyond illegal that it is only a matter of time > before Apple gets the big legal spanking it deserves. > > Randall Reetz > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
