Colin Holgate wrote:
> The one thing that Kevin says that seems like a wrong conclusion,
> is that they will continue to support the existing iPhone version
> for Apple Enterprise customers. Those are the ones that are allowed
> to deploy their own apps to some number of hundreds of users. But
> the license agreement doesn't say anything about Store submissions,
> it only says that you have to use certain languages, and you can't
> use an interpreter layer. An Enterprise user making an app for
> internal use would have still broken the agreement.
It seems even Jobs knows his limits sometimes - from the MonoTouch
mailing list:
I emailed Steve Jobs earlier today, and either he (or some
delegate) replied, and the answers were pretty clear.
Paraphrasing his reply: "The new provision is ONLY intended
to apply to applications distributed through the app store.
<http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/monotouch/2010-April/001878.html>
But that's just an email from a developer, and I've found no formal
confirmation from Apple either way.
And course if it's true, it's only true as of 11:06AM on 10 May 2010.
Who knows what the license will say by noon...
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
Rev training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
Webzine for Rev developers: http://www.revjournal.com
revJournal blog: http://revjournal.com/blog.irv
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
