Robert,

These are excellent issues and questions. We have a very robust discussion area for thoughts and comments from everyone. We also have monthly online (GoToMeeting) summits for pre-release registrants where we review all relevant technological issues...from syntax and language to architecture and scope. We want a healthy exchange of ideas while we build.

It's our goal to have the highest performance, most secure solutions money can buy. We really want our hosting to be A-1. We have chosen a premium provider and review performance and configurations frequently. I have a good background in server-side architecture, security and performance.

When I do run into my own ignorance, I know what to ask and whom to ask. Also, Sarah and MJ are very knowledgeable, and they ARE both mothers. They are endowed with great reserves of common sense and good judgement.

HOWEVER...

We are now in a gray area as far as discussion here on the How to Use Revolution list goes. I'm between a rock and a hard place. I don't want to appear unresponsive to your and other questions, but I also don't want to wear out my welcome here. I try to give quick answers and then redirect to our discussion group.

So follow our discussion area and participate. It's free. Or better yet, actually get involved. Buy into the project and help guide it as we go one step at a time. We are going to listen most closely to the people we are committing to us and our project early-on.

There aren't many opportunities to grow a new dev environment for a new class of device. This is a huge technical opportunity for everyone involved. Especially for Sarah, MJ and me. We want to share it with others, and we want it to be financially rewarding for the first 250 people involved (253 counting the three of us).

Best,

Jerry Daniels

Follow the Rodeo discussion:
http://rodeoapps.com/rodeo-discuss-among-yourselves

On Jun 8, 2010, at 3:09 PM, Robert Mann wrote:

Yes indeed, Mike, i understand jerry's answer as far as server side accounts
are concerned.

I was just pointing out that in the context of "html5 local storage", if and
when a web app uses that storage, then there are issues of security.

I'm working on an eDemocracy site & app. i'll try hard to make it as secure as possible in order not to allow anybody to gather information about what
somebody else think.

What troubles me is at the same time to see a big move towards mobile
advertisement AND the launching of HTML5 local storage which unlike cookies (which have caused trouble in the minds!) can have persistent datas, and
much more datas.

So I beleive it could be a good thing to be very clear on this data policy
with users, for a change!

Actually I do have a question on this HTML5 specifs : how can the user
monitor datas? Has he got the right to go and inspect? or is it context dependant, e.i only a javascript program imbedded in a page of the said
domain could get to the datas? If anybody has a clue, thanks!

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to