Thanks Jim and Klaus for your helpful ideas Tiemo > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] [mailto:use-revolution- > [email protected]] Im Auftrag von Jim Ault > Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juni 2010 14:01 > An: How to use Revolution > Betreff: Re: AW: How to implement a timebased reminder? > > make a check box button > on mouseup > callMyStackScriptTimer > end mouseUp > > on callMyStackScriptTimer waitSecs > if waitSecs is empty then put 10 into waitSecs > if the hilight of btn "timerStatus" is true then > -- do these commands > send "callMyStackScriptTimer" in waitSecs seconds > end if > end callMyStackScriptTimer > > --now the script can be called by different routines > --setting the hilight of the check box will stop any 'send in' calls > --obviously, if your mouseup turns off the check box, the loop will > skip the tasks > > This is just one way of accomplishing the task. > > Jim Ault > Las Vegas > > > On Jun 11, 2010, at 4:51 AM, Tiemo Hollmann TB wrote: > > > Hi Klaus, > > yes I tried it already with ditto, but my Win7 machine started > > smoking and > > making funny noise! > > Using "send in" in a self calling handler to get the infinite "loop" > > or what > > would be the calling handler? > > Thanks > > Tiemo > > > > > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >> Von: [email protected] [mailto:use-revolution- > >> [email protected]] Im Auftrag von Klaus on-rev > >> Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Juni 2010 13:39 > >> An: How to use Revolution > >> Betreff: Re: How to implement a timebased reminder? > >> > >> Hi Tiemo, > >> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I would like to create a timebased reminder (like a reminder from a > >> calendar > >>> app), which runs the whole day "in the background"/ as a task icon > >> (windows) > >>> or gadget and reminds me in settable intervals about anything. > >>> > >>> How do you realize this kind of app with using a minimum of the > >> processor > >>> power? Using idle and idlerate or any kind of loop or perhaps > >> something > >>> completely different? > >> > >> Do not use IDLE! > >> > >>> Which would be the less consuming approach? > >>> > >>> Any hint welcome > >> > >> this also can be done with "ditto" :-D > >> > >> No, just kidding, use "send ... in... " for this purpose! > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
