Mark Chia wrote: >> - Revolution 1 (various versions) didn't seem to be bothered if I renamed the >> 'top-level' app (eg to "Revolution 1.1.1r2"). When beta testing 2.0, it >> seemed to mess up the Distribution Builder if I did this. Has this been >> fixed, or do one or both of the engines insist on being called "Revolution" >> at the top level of the folder? (If both, this is clearly going to mess with >> my cunning plan...) > > It will be fine as the OSX engine is acutally called Revolution.app and the > classic version is Revolution.
Mark, Thanks for the response, and indeed as you point out they can both live in the same place. But meanwhile, has the underlying issue been fixed? Is there likely to be a problem, on either or both platforms, if the app is renamed? TIA, Ben Rubinstein | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cognitive Applications Ltd | Phone: +44 (0)1273-821600 http://www.cogapp.com | Fax : +44 (0)1273-728866 _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
