I agree with Jacque on the way to handle this, but in defense of Charles61, this is a real clunky thing. I shouldn't have to work around this, especially since it's been like this through several major revisions. It's the result of menu's being objects that reside on a card but are invisible (sort of). The IDE should treat a system menu as a separate distinct object, but of course, where would you put it? Maybe that poses other problems, perhaps with backward compatibility with other engines and such. Who knows? It seems though that the Mac IDE could just ignore the object instead of taking it into account when sizing and displaying the stack. I dunno.
Bob On Jul 1, 2010, at 1:59 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > charles61 wrote: >> I guess my question is how do >> other developers handle this type of situation when they hide the >> menubar on the first card? Or what do you suggest? > > I handle it by not doing that. :) If you're trying to simulate a splash > screen, you're better off using a substack approach. Make your main stack the > splash with the image, then hide it after a few seconds and open a substack > that contains your main content. > > Otherwise, leave the menu in place on card 1. Windows users expect it and Mac > users won't see it. Resize your image to fit under the menu area. > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay | [email protected] > HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
