Not sure, but I'd guess that the OP is falling afoul of the elastic nature of groups that have lockloc=false. When that is the case, groups automatically snap to the bounds of whatever they contain whenever they get the chance -- i.e. when the things they contain move or are themselves resized (I believe, I haven't tested all the variations here). That can cause some unexpected behavior if you're expecting groups to behave as if their lockloc were true, which allows them to be sized and positioned as most other controls are (whether those controls have their lockloc set to true or false).
gc On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 3:21 PM, <dunb...@aol.com> wrote: > Me, too, with a group and an even smaller image. > > If I set the loc of the image to a point outside the group, the group > expands to contain it, as usual. If I set it to a point anywhere inside the > group, again, the group extent adjusts. > > On a Mac. Does this matter? > > Craig Newman > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
