On 09/04/2010 01:00 AM, Kee Nethery wrote:

I'm no unicode expert and I applaud your efforts. I see two possible places for 
a bug in unicode for the stack you have provided: Mac OS X, or the user 
installed Sanskrit font.

Might you have an example that uses any of the fonts that come bundled with Mac 
OS X? That would rule out the user installed font as the problem and point 
directly to the OS. If you could provide such an example, I could absolutely 
file it in the Apple bug system.

If the bug only occurs with the provided Sanskrit font, do you have a unicode 
organization recognized validator (kind of like http://validator.w3.org/) that 
would indicate that the provided Sanskrit font passes all validations imposed 
by the standard. Again, if there is a way to prove the font is 100% valid, and 
there are display problems on the Mac OS X, I could file that bug in the Apple 
bug system.

Kee Nethery (who is a neophyte Unicode user)

_______________________________________________

Just uploaded a new version that uses "Sathu.ttf", a Unicode font from the Mac OS Tiger install disk.

I have bundled "Sathu" in the zip file [Ouch, Steve will be after me] to sabe all of you the bother of overloading your system with fonts you don't need, and for those of you who want to try the stack
on other operating systems.

http://andregarzia.on-rev.com/richmond/STUFF/Daft_Unicode.zip

Methinks Scott hath too much faith in Mac OS . . .  :)

sincerely, Richmond.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to