On 09/20/2010 10:13 PM, [email protected] wrote:
This was a thead a while ago. What to call the language. I also prefer
"transcript". It sounds grown-up, professional, even. Something "hypertalk"
lacked; which always seemed, well, not grown-up.
I hope that the product name change (never mind the far less critical
language name) is well considered, and brings simplicity and success.
A name change normally signals a new direction, a break with the past,
rather than
continuity building on established foundations. One wonders, in that
light, how
well considered the name change is; unless, of course, the "Company formally
known as Runtime Revolution" is doing a Hot Black DeSatio ????
Craig Newman
In a message dated 9/20/10 2:28:49 PM, [email protected] writes:
I personally prefer it to be called Transcript though.because it just
sounds unique and the sort. Plus SourceForge has officially accepted it as one
of the programming languages around. And they call it Transcript. So I say
and pick Transcript! :)
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
