You may be right but they have mentioned plugin with on-rev in the past if I remember correctly. I think that is the link that is supposed to make your on-rev site rev compatible rather than being just another site on the web. I could be wrong though because it is hard to follow a lot of things.
-=>JB<=- On Sep 21, 2010, at 11:21 AM, stephen barncard wrote: > web deployment=plugin > > they don't list on-rev accounts yet > > On 21 September 2010 11:18, -=>JB<=- <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I purchased the on-rev package when it came out and now when I look >> at my account it says Web Deployment - already purchased. I also am >> a Enterprise user so it may be connected to that but it sounds more like >> it is connected to on-rev to me. >> >> -=>JB<=- >> >> >> >> On Sep 21, 2010, at 6:08 AM, David Bovill wrote: >> >>> On 21 September 2010 12:28, -=>JB<=- <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I think it is the On-Rev package that has been offered >>>> for quite some time now and many have purchased >>>> it already so if they continue to develop it more will >>>> likely purchase it and with the right improvements >>>> it can exceed their sales expectations. >>>> >>> >>> That would make sense - On-Rev has (commercial) potential, but I don't >> think >>> it is the case. If you look at the Standalone Settings (I am viewing it >> with >>> a trial license) - the Web settings that allow you to create a revWeb >> plugin >>> has the option to purchase a $199 upgrade - I assume this is in order to >> let >>> you make these plugins as this export option has nothing to do with using >>> On-Rev. It is not clear, if you can make them for non-commercial use, but >> it >>> looks like the standalone builder will stop making revWeb plugins after >> the >>> trial expires? >>> >>> Personally I can (sort of) imagine people paying $30 for the ability to >> make >>> revWeb plugins - I really don't get this $199 pricing. The rest seems >>> logical to me, and I do very much like the branding LiveCode, but it >> seems >>> the current pricing strategy will have two clear outcomes: >>> >>> 1. It will clobber Linux sales - I think the bundles would be better >>> Mac+Linux and Windows+Linux. >>> 2. Deter future revWeb plugin development when it becomes clear how >> many >>> people will pay for it as an isolated feature. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> use-revolution mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >> subscription preferences: >>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> use-revolution mailing list >> [email protected] >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >> subscription preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution >> > > > > -- > > > > Stephen Barncard > San Francisco Ca. USA > > more about sqb <http://www.google.com/profiles/sbarncar> > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
