Hi all, Am 04.10.2010 um 18:15 schrieb Ian Wood:
> WepP doesn't really offer anything over JPEG, I honestly can't see any reason > for it to take off. > > File sizes can be slightly smaller, but it has the same bit depth, *smaller* > pixel dimension limits, doesn't appear to include a progressive download spec > like JPEG, doesn't include an alpha layer for transparency like PNGs etc. etc. > > Ian > > On 4 Oct 2010, at 17:04, Richmond wrote: >> http://code.google.com/speed/webp/download.html >> >> Is this just Google trying to extend its imperialistic influence >> even further, or is this s serious competitor up against >> PNG and GIF? >> >> Is RunRev/LiveCode going to be able to import and export WebP >> in a future recension? anyone remembers JPEG2000? Good quality and tiny file sizes. If yes, when did you last encounter this file type? OK, that may answer the question :-) Best Klaus -- Klaus Major http://www.major-k.de [email protected] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
