On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 10:44 PM, Dar Scott wrote:



On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 10:07 PM, Mark Brownell wrote:


    f = S1[a] + S2[b]
    f = bitXor( f , S3[c] )
    f = bitAnd( f + S4[d], -1 )

There are a couple problems, I think the same functionality is the cause though.

From TD: the largest long integer allowed by the current operating system. (On most operating systems, this is 2^32, or 4,294,967,296.)



So your F function could be just 3 lines, then: the binaryEncode, the binaryDecode and the above 3 combined in the return.

function F halfBlock
put binaryEncode(...
put binaryDecode(...
return ( ( ((S1[a] + S2[b]) mod 2^32) bitXor S3[c] ) + S4[d] ) mod 2^32
end F


Dar Scott

put binaryEncode("N",xLprime) into fourChars

This is the inverse of what you did for creating half blocks and you will also do this in converting from blocks to a string.

I was hoping there was an inverse process like this.



You can pick out the codes for each of those chars with 'charToNum(char 1 of fourChars)', but this might work, too:


put binaryDecode("CCCC",fourChars,a,b,c,d) into numConverted
-- either ignore numConverted or check that it is 4

I'll try out things until I get these working. This could speed things up quite a bit. I was using all the assembly loops and long math equations in the Lingo version, Director 7 on Mac X; OS 9.2 where the processor is running at about 240 megahertz. That would encrypt about 40 kbts of text per second. My experience is that some things in Rev are much faster than Director. It will be nice to test this for speed once I have added these optimizations.


I wonder if a hard coded button script is faster than a broken out version using function calls like for function F and similar parts of P & S-box regeneration? When this is done there will be both examples for implementation. then I will know. I wonder if there will be anyone interested in using this?

Later,
Mark

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to