Mark Wieder wrote:

(disclaimer: the Creative Commons License rather explicitly states
that it shouldn't be used for software, but that's what I use anyway
because it comes the closest to exactly what I want my licensing to
say for an open source project)

Why does CCL have that limitation?

It's so useful, and I haven't found another license that fits some of the scenarios I'd like to deploy in as well as that one.


What I do is create a custom property and file the license away in it:

put "This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5
License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ or send a letter to
Creative Commons, 543 Howard Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco,
California, 94105, USA." into tCCLicense

set the uRIP["EULA"] of this stack to tCCLicense

then you can grab it from the custom property and display it however
you want:

put the uRIP["EULA"] of this stack into field "License"

Nice to see the RIP spec getting even more use.

For those who aren't familiar with RIP properties, check out Ken Ray's Edinbugh Core Metadata Initiative (ECMI) spec at the Rev Interoperability Project, in the Files section:

<http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/revInterop/>

ECMI is a collaborative community effort to suggest a common set of properties for common things like licensing, update info, versioning, etc.

There's also another initiative started there that could use some help for those so inclined: a proposal to create a public domain behavior script for field objects to provide data validation and masking. Feel free to jump in.

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World
 LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
 Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com
 LiveCode Journal blog: http://LiveCodejournal.com/blog.irv
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to