Monte Goulding wrote:
> I ran a quick test with a stack with 500 graphics and a slightly
> different script:
>
> on mouseUp
> put fld "file" into tStackFile
> --
> delete stack tStackFile
> put the millisecs into t
> repeat with X=1 to the number of grcs of stack tStackFile
> put the uTest of grc X of stack tStackFile into r1
> end repeat
> put the millisecs - t into t1
> --
> delete stack tStackFile
> put the millisecs into t
> toplevel tStackFile
> put the short name of stack tStackFile into tStack
> repeat with X=1 to the number of grcs of stack tStack
> put the uTest of grc X of stack tStack into r2
> end repeat
> close stack tStackFile
> put the millisecs - t into t2
> --
> put t1 && t2 &&(r1=r2) into fld "r"
> end mouseUp
>
> Result: 1034 212 true
>
> There was no significant difference with destroyStack property true
> or false. Adding another 500 graphics to the card resulted in this:
> 8863 399 true
>
> Changing toplevel to go invisible stack resulted in this:
> 8596 72 true
Great work, Monte! Thanks for running that test.
So the difference is in addressing controls *within* a stack, but not
with the stack itself. Hard to anticipate, but very good to know.
So Peter has a solution, and I learned two new things today about
performance.
A good day...
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com
LiveCode Journal blog: http://LiveCodejournal.com/blog.irv
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
