>> Frankly, distributing a stack with a stackrunner as a commercial >> package doesn't look that good; >> especially as anybody who can get their paws (sweaty or otherwise) >> on a copy of RR/LC can merrily >> start mucking around with your stack. > > Agree with that. That's one of the reasons I've never liked using a > secondary stack file as a solution to the problem of not being able to > store data in a standalone.
You *can* of course password protect your stack, and on OS X you can put the stack inside the StackRunner bundle. And of course you can change the name of the StackRunner app and even modify its info.plist file on OS X to customize it even more - the only thing you can't do is eliminate the "Get Info" information since that's embedded in the resources of the executable. Just my 2 cents, Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software, Inc. Email: [email protected] Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
