On Thursday, July 3, 2003, at 01:45 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Okay, I got curious. I revised Dar's original script, which contained no repeats, to include a long repeat loop:
I think this can be improved by putting an empty loop in the correction timing. That should get rid of the loop overhead and you would see a greater difference.
If one's computer cannot do the short time measurement, the loop is the best way to go.
Dar Scott
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
