Alex Rice wrote: > On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, at 08:27 AM, Ken Norris wrote: > >> Well, I'm not using Jaguar...yet...so it's nonsequiter. >> >> Still, taking a screenshot into a PDF makes no sense to me. 9 times >> out of >> 10 you'll have to convert it to something you can edit later...that'd >> be a >> total waste of time, IMO. > > It's actually very convenient. I take screenshots all the time and send > the PDFs in email to coworkers. PDFs are just as editable as other > image file types IMHO. Acrobat edits them directly. Photoshop can read > them. PDF actually has an editing version history built into the > document format. Maybe they are more editable than say a PICT or BMP?
But with fewer tools able to edit them, and most of those tools being more expensive. ;( -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation Developer of WebMerge 2.2: Publish any database on any site ___________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com Tel: 323-225-3717 AIM: FourthWorldInc _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
