>But my reason for using entire alphabet instead of I and Z is that I >think it could be possible for some font to have an I and Z have a >difference in width that is less than the resolution of "the >formattedWidth". I can't visualize what the font would be, but it's >certainly possible. That's why I would make it more reliable by >comparing multiple letters. Thoughts?
Oh, sorry, I forgot to mention this other part. In the fields I set up to test, I make the fontsize something like 18 points (or larger). This should insure that the difference between "i" and "M" (I think you're right about "M") are clearly differentiated. I had set of some tests that gave me the actual formattedwidth of each character at different sizes, and at the larger sizes, they were always clearly different. Howard Bornstein ____________________ D E S I G N E Q www.designeq.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
