On Friday, July 25, 2003, at 10:06 PM, Alex Rice wrote:
On Friday, July 25, 2003, at 07:56 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
On Friday, July 25, 2003, at 07:21 PM, Mark Brownell wrote:
"perlRegEx = 13, PNLP = 3" using:
put "<perl>(.*)(</perl>)" into regEx
I wonder if--by one making a few assumptions--this can be optimized.
The ".*" is the most general pattern and so it's the worst, performance wise. By restricting the pattern a bit we can speed it up. Using Mark's test case with "<perl>([^<]+)(</perl>)" the run-times are almost identical.
Alex Rice
Ten seconds ago I sent this to Dar off-list:
What do you mean? I don't get it.
Mark
Tag teams...
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
