That was me, actually. I haven't reported it because it seems to be totally unpredictable, and I wanted to have a good recipe for repeating it before I reported. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, sometimes it steps over evertyhing except this one recursive funtion, sometimes it doesn't step over anything.
So - nothing useful to report beyond the debugger is broken. Which I have reported. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Hurley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 1:35 PM Subject: Re: Step over still not fixed in 2.02 > > > >Message: 12 > >Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 12:38:31 -0600 > >Subject: Re: Step over still not fixed in 2.02 > >From: Alex Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 12:03 PM, Jim Hurley wrote: > > > >> I must say I am very disappointed that the Step Over feature of the > >> debugger has not been fixed in 2.02 > >> > >> For me, the debugger is not usable until that is corrected. It was the > >> only *serious* problem I had with 2.01. > > > >Jim, I've been using the Step Over function of the debugger quite a > >lot, in v2.0.1. The debugger is definitely usable for me. Not without > >it's quirks, but usable. Must be something particular about your script > >if it's not usable at all for you. > > > >I remember seeing a post something about a recursive handler or > >something. I don't see anything in bugzilla from you. Have you filed a > >bugzilla report on this? Attach a stack or script that the debugger > >fails on as well. > > > >Hope this helps, > > > >Alex Rice, Software Developer > >Architectural Research Consultants, Inc. > >http://ARCplanning.com > > > > Alex, > > Actually a number of people have mentioned this problem on this list, > and several others have also remarked on the fact that the bug had > been reported. > > I guess a lot depends on what kind of scripts one is debugging. If > there is extensive use of user-defined handlers, it is a nightmare > trying to wade through a nested set of routines. It is somewhat > quixotic. Some handlers it will step over and some it will not. Very > frustrating. > > For this reason, I have stuck with 1.1.1, waiting for this fix. > > Jim > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
