On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:45:52 +0100, Keith Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I'm not against the idea of a forum especially for following up past issues,
>but I would not want to lose the list. There are still quite a few on dial
>up access for whom the list provides a quick economical way of keeping up
>with the debate offline.

I'm not on dialup, but I have an observation. I have found that
whenever I've been involved in a group discussion that has gone from
email list to a supposedly 'easier to use' forum I've always stopped
using it. However, that's just my own (arguably strange) behaviour...

I agree - Forums are harder to browse than you think, and those little 'new' icons never seem to be quite telling the truth, do they? But for me the biggest crunch is the aforementioned not being able to work offline. I work in 2 locations, one with a permanently-connected cable modem running at about 512kbps, and one with a phone line that seldom achieves more than 33kbps in practice. I just couldn't efficiently participate in any group that insisted on one being online all the time one was reading it. I do use Forums now (like the Adobe ones), but I just plunge in and get out as soon as possible when/if my problem is solved. With RunRev just reading everything that comes in is an education in itself. For example, I've just awarded myself the prize for least-informed RunRev lister, on the grounds that I don't even know what XML is. Somehow in 42 years of programming/IT it passed me by. But thanks to the list, I'm about to find out.


Graham


---------------------------------------------------
Graham Samuel / The Living Fossil Co. / UK & France



_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to