Anyway why did they set a recursionlimit on recursive function calls and not on repeat loops? The answer is somewhere in the reference on the recursionlimit:
< This property allows you to adjust the limit on the depth of recursion for function calls, decreasing it for quicker failure during development, or increasing it if you require more depth to execute a recursive algorithm on a larger data set. The value is the size in bytes of the CPU call stack. The actual function call depth limit will depend on such factors as the CPU type, how functions are called, and the number of parameters passed to each function. >
I am sure you can figure out why.
Have a nice evening, WA
On maandag, sep 1, 2003, at 18:01 Europe/Brussels, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 10 Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:56:01 -0600 Subject: Re: The Directory Walker revisited From: Alex Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday, September 1, 2003, at 04:45 AM, wouter wrote:
But I watched it bump into the recursion-limit wall. Following is a non recursive version of this script.
I thought we could set the recursion limit in Rev 2.x?
Alex Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Mindlube Software | http://mindlube.com
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
