On Thursday, September 4, 2003, at 09:31 AM, Geoff Canyon wrote:
I'm coming late to the party (I haven't read everything in the directory walker thread) but this isn't recursive code:
Yeah. He was showing a recursive-like alternative that avoided the recursion problems.
BTW, I noticed that Tuviah (in response to size concerns and comments in another thread) mentioned that he is adjusting the settings for the build used in the release. It might be that on some platforms the current settings create a huge call overhead, maybe 40K per call. Or maybe something else is at work here.
Also, I hope it is clear that I think a non-recursion solution is great; I just think the recursion version should be OK and if it is hitting a recursion limit, something is wrong.
Dar Scott
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
