--- Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > everything in a stack file is loaded > into memory whenever you open > it, so referring to them is a good option for > stacks with lots of images, as > that generally takes less memory since it only > loads the images needed for the current card.
in terms of say, hundreds, is a ball park estimate possible for "lots of images"? thanks, Erik ===== [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikhansen.org __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
