Dan, just curious... why start with Valentina and switch to MySQL instead of using Valentina Server? I know it's in beta right now, but I've been using it for awhile and it seems to work quite well for me and my client. It's not as robust as MySQL, but it is multi-user, has locked records, etc. and wouldn't require switching from one DB to another.
Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Shafer > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 8:00 PM > To: Revolution List > Subject: Using Valentina Locally, Switching to MySQL on Server` > > > Is it a logical design approach to build a product so that as a > stand-alone, it relies on Valentina but when deployed in a multi-user > networked environment, it switches to a central MySQL (or similar) > database? Would it be easy to compartmentalize the back end such that > the move from one to the other could be fairly transparent? > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Dan Shafer, Revolutionary > Author of forthcoming 3-book set, > "Revolution: Programming at the Speed of Thought" http://www.revolutionpros.com for More Info _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
