> A single character is a single character. It could be anything that helps > prevent name-space conflicts. The "g" has an additional value as a > mnemonic; "g" means "global", and it lets you use other chars for other > types (e.g., "p" for "parameter").
You're right of course. See below. > If you use an underscore for globals, what do you use for other types? I don't. I misread the problem in the original post as having to do with object references, not variable references. I was referring to the use of underscores for object names (ie field _name vs field "name"). I do, in fact, use the same naming conventions for variables. Apologies for the misread. Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, Multimedia & Design ----- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.tactilemedia.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
