on 11.10.03 5:23 PM, Bj�rnke von Gierke wrote: > I am in the process of writing an article about runrev, and would like > to ask you about two things: > > Did you experience that you wanted to make a project, but where unable > to do it with runrev? For example because a technology was not > supported, not fast enough or because it was otherwise not up to the > task. > > DId you realise any projects that you did not think that it would be > possible to do with runrev?
As a 16-year HyperCard/SuperCard/Spinnaker Plus/WinPlus/MetaCard/RunRev veteran who also programs in C++, I've often run into performance or technology barriers that have forced me to drop back into C++ - that is, until I hooked up with MetaCard. I found that at first, I would need something MetaCard could not provide; then, just as I would despair and break out the compiler, MetaCard would come out with a new version incorporating just what I needed. Lately MetaCard and its heir Runtime Revolution have outstripped my demands: there are whole realms of new features that I might employ if had time to imagine uses for them. t + Tereza Snyder + Senior Software Developer + Attainment Company, Inc. + <www.attainmentcompany.com> + 800.327.4269 _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
