Yesterday I was surprised to find that the ids & ordinals of the menu buttons and other controls of a cloned stack were not the same as those in the stack it was cloned from. (At least not always, if it seems to work for you, try modifying the order of the controls in the source stack before cloning it.)
Apparently, if one uses control id references in stack handlers, one must be sure never to clone the stack.
I reference menu buttons by id rather than name to support application translatability. I have had to change the references from "button id [the id]" to "button [ordinal] of group "myMenubar" in stacks that can be cloned (plain "button [ordinal]" also resolves to different controls in the original & cloned stacks).
It seems to me that, ideally, a cloned stack should be identical to the stack from which it was cloned. If you are expecting this behavior, be aware it isn't always so.
Rob Cozens CCW, Serendipity Software Company http://www.oenolog.net/who.htm
"And I, which was two fooles, do so grow three; Who are a little wise, the best fooles bee."
from "The Triple Foole" by John Donne (1572-1631) _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
