Thanks. That looks a good deal cleaner and clearer than the do do. Dave
>try this: > >put fname & x into theFieldName >put tname & x into theValueName >put field theFieldName into value(theValueName) > >On Tuesday, January 13, 2004, at 05:00 PM, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> This works well for the second half of the process, >> however, I still seem to need the "do" syntax for >> getting the line into the variable in the first half. It >> is working, so I don't need to change it, but it is >> rather cumbersome. In other words, if I reverse the >> above to: >> put fld (fname & x) into value(tname & x) >> it produces an error, with or without 'value'. > >_______________________________________________ >use-revolution mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
