Why are you not just using the open stack in your stacks???

You can open a stack outside of your mainstack and use it as a palette in your main stack. it does not have to be a sub of a sub of a sub. it can just be separate completely from the beginning.

FWIW

Tom

On Jan 22, 2004, at 7:48 AM, Doug Lerner wrote:

On 1/22/04 9:26 PM, "Doug Lerner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 1/22/04 6:16 PM, "Brian Yennie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Not quite. You can have as many levels as you want, but the "mainStack"
property must always refer to a stack which is _not_ a substack at the
time, thus the building up instead of down I suggested. I think my
workaround may work for you.


If it's mainly a script-sharing issue, you can also use the "start
using" command (or "library") to make a stack's scripts available
wherever you need them.

I'll take a look at "start using". I can't get a sub-sub-stack to work no
matter what combination I try.

Whoa! That "start using" command sure caused a zillion unexpected and weird
weird weird results that took me a while to disentangle from! I better find
a different way...


doug

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution



Macintosh PowerBook G-4 OSX 10.3.1, OS 9.2.2, 1.25 GHz, 512MB RAM, Rev 2.1.2



Advanced Media Group Thomas J McGrath III • 2003 • [EMAIL PROTECTED] 220 Drake Road, Bethel Park, PA 15102



_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to