Doug, > This is "ok", but I was hoping to be able to do this more > modularly - keeping all of a particular stack's handlers > within a substack. But as soon as I needed a depth of more > than 2 (a substack of a substack) this became unfeasible.
AFAIK you can't have a substack of a substack, so I don't know what you mean... > I think better support for a more flexible stack hierarchy > would be useful in future Rev enhancements. Especially for > groups of people working together on a single project, or for > creating plugin features to an existing app. How do you think the hierarchy should be changed? Just curious... Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
