Doug Lerner wrote: > I have a stack and a substack > > Stack A (contains a preOpenStack) > Stack B (contains a preOpenStack) > > I have a "pass preOpenStack" as the last line of my preOpenStack handlers. > > It seems that when I open Stack B that *both* of the preOpenStack handlers > run - the one for Stack B and then the one for Stack A. > > Is that because I have the "pass" statement in there? > > It seems like I should remove the pass statement. Any idea why the docs in > their examples include it? It seems like it would only be useful if you also > wanted the main stack's preOpenStack handler to run. Isn't that right?
It's often considered good practice to be in the habit of passing system messages, so if you want to modify behavior later you can add a handler farther down the message path without having to go back and revise each script. -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation ___________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
