Wouldn't you have to make the processingShutDown flag a global to retain its value for something like this?
doug On 1/25/04 1:40 AM, "Thierry Arbellot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > try this > > local processingShutDown = false > > on shutDownRequest > if processingShutDown = false then > answer "Are you sure you want to quit?" with "No" or "Yes" > if it is "Yes" then > put true into processingShutDown > pass shutDownRequest > end if > end if > end shutDownRequest > > Hope it helps > > Thierry > > Le Saturday, 24 Jan 2004, � 15:25 Europe/Paris, Doug Lerner a �crit : > >> I am seeing my "are you sure you want to shut down" twice (the >> shutDownRequest handler) prompt twice now. >> >> I think the reason for this is that I added an >> >> insert script for stack "mainstack" into back >> >> so I could make use of the mainstack handlers in all the stacks. >> >> But the shutDownRequest handler looks like this: >> >> on shutDownRequest >> answer "Are you sure you want to quit?" with "No" or "Yes" >> if it is "Yes" then >> pass shutDownRequest >> end if >> end shutDownRequest >> >> I need to "pass shutDownRequest". I think the "pass shutDownRequest" is >> passing it "up" the path and it is re-encountering itself in the >> backScripts. >> >> Any ideas of how to avoid this problem? >> >> Thanks, >> >> doug >> >> _______________________________________________ >> use-revolution mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution >> > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
