On Thursday, February 5, 2004, at 08:43 PM, Chipp Walters wrote:
I think it's up to the developer to link libraries during the development
phase, and to distribute the application with the linked libraries in the
order which works best for him/her.
I guess you mean the application developer, not the library developer?
If so, that seems to be the consensus.
I tend to lean the other direction. A person who (say) buys a library is not that interested in all the libraries and their externals needed to support it and I would have thought would not want to be bothered with connecting them all together. But if application developers are used to the notion of connecting it all together, ...
There might be ways that sub-libraries are implemented other than separate stack files, though. They might be included as substacks. A script library might be pasted into a stack script. A back-script library might come on a button. Stacks and externals might be embedded.
Dar Scott
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
