Win 95, 98, XP are all one license, right? So why would OS 9 and OS X be separate?
I hate to get back into the pricing debate again, but once again the pricing model defies logic. Most frustrating. (And, no it's not relevant to me, I bought the whole magilla and glad I am thank you!)
M
On Feb 23, 2004, at 2:55 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
On 2/23/04 10:35 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
But as for getting going with Mac, I believe all Mac versions are included in the Mac license, which would mean both OS X and the older Classic. I can't imagine RunRev would charge separately for the defunct OS 9.
Actually, it's a separate license.
-- Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED] HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
