hershrev wrote:

if not (x contains y) then beep

This is the one.

Good catch. Sorry to have led you astray. I've been seduced by the otherwise orthogonal grace of Transcript.


I wonder why "does not contain" is not implemented?

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___________________________________________________________
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]       http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to