I kind of wanted to make Rev client for it, as it is all open XML, but I doubt it would turn out all that well. Since it is my primary IM protocol maybe I should learn something about XML .. hrm
Yours, Chris On Feb 29, 2004, at 3:12 AM, Ops wrote:
of course....what would be lost in all this...is the *valuable* information trail that is created by the list itself...just the (valid) banter so far about which IM technology would be "the one"...is, well, "telling"...and (IMHO) proof enough that the concept, while novel and not without merit...is futile to even consider with today's technology(s) and the "fruits" which would become inaccessible to the list at large....
Opie
Brian Yennie wrote:
I should add as bait to many that the Jabber protocol is relatively easy to implement.
A Rev chat client could easily tap into the major IM networks that way.for OSX I heartily recommend Fire http://fire.sourceforge.net/ ... very well done, overall. I use it for Jabber and AIM. Of course some functionality is lost, as mentioned, but overall I find it to be the best choice for me.
Yours, Chris On Feb 28, 2004, at 7:39 PM, Ken Ray wrote:
www.indigofield.com
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
