Thanks very much. Can I put my vote in at least to try and get this in if possible. I think that most developers expect to be able to dependably set the version number of their applications when building standalones. The worst thing here is that it appears that setting versions is support because there are fields for setting the information in the standalone builder - but it doesn't actually do it.
I was wondering why my installation software was not updating the executable files - it wasn't until I checked the standalones that I realised this problem exists. This is not good - but at least there is a work around.
Rodney
On 8/03/2004, at 8:13 PM, Monte Goulding wrote:
Hi Monte,
Thanks for this information. It's not just XP, the same problem happens under Windows 2000
OK... it will be one fix for all anyway. But it may not get into the next
revision of Rev due to the complexity.
Cheers
Monte
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
-- Rodney Tamblyn 44 Melville Street Dunedin New Zealand +64 3 4778606 http://rodney.weblogs.com/
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
