Thanks for the suggestion but I do not believe this will function on non *NIX 
platforms.  I really need a multiplatform solution since I expect my applications to 
run on MSWindows and several*NIX platforms (a requiredment of the product).


Kevin


-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-
Disclaimer:

Any resemblance between the above views and those of my
employer, my terminal, or the view out my window are purely
coincidental. 
Any resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.

 The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
them
is left as an exercise for the reader. The question of the existence of
the reader
 is left as an exercise for the second god coefficient. 
(A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism is beyond the
scope of this article.)



 --- On Thu 03/11, James Cass < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: James Cass [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 03:35:44 -0500
Subject: Re: Command line parameters?

Kevin -<br><br>The environment variable you're looking for is:  $#<br>For example, if 
I had this little shell script called "args.sh"<br><br>   #!/bin/sh<br>   echo Number 
of arguments passed is $#<br>       for arg in "$@"<br>     do<br>            echo 
$arg<br> done<br><br>and passed it this:<br>     args.sh 1 2 3 4 5<br><br>it would 
return this:<br><br>  Number of arguments passed is 8<br>     1<br>   2<br>   3<br>   
4<br>   5<br><br>Hope this helps....James<br><br><br>On Mar 11, 2004, at 2:14 AM, 
Kevin wrote:<br><br>><br>><br>> I am unable to locate a construct that would provide 
the number of <br>> parameters that have been passed via the command line.  I am aware 
of <br>> $0 ... $n but how does one know how many there are a how would I loop <br>> 
through them?<br>><br>> Kevin<br>><br>><br>> 
-==-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-<br>> Disclaimer:<br>><br>> Any 
resemblance between the above views and those of my<br>> employer, my terminal, or the 
view out my window are purely<br>> coincidental.<br>> An
 y resemblance between the above and my own views is <br>> 
non-deterministic.<br>><br>>  The question of the existence of views in the absence of 
anyone to <br>> hold<br>> them<br>> is left as an exercise for the reader. The 
question of the existence of<br>> the reader<br>>  is left as an exercise for the 
second god coefficient.<br>> (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism 
is beyond the<br>> scope of this article.)<br>><br>><br>><br>> 
_______________________________________________<br>> Join Excite! - 
http://www.excite.com<br>> The most personalized portal on the Web!<br>> 
_______________________________________________<br>> use-revolution mailing list<br>> 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]<br>> 
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution<br>><br><br>

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to