on Sat, 20 Mar 2004 10:04:59 -0700 Dar Scott wrote in response to Richard Gaskin:
>> It's said to be a derivative of DES, with equivalent security. >Though it may have equivalent security, that does not >follow from the use of DES. Often the weaknesses of >any protocol are not in the encryption itself but in >how the encryption is used. Dar, i remember that Scott Raney states in the MetaCard documentation that stacks level of encription is not hacker-proof and recommended to use customs solutions if more protection is needed. Mark Brownell has already made a Blowfish encription stack and Phil Chumbley posted some time ago a script for one time pad encription, but i don't know how to protect a whole stack with these solutions. You have a lot of experience in this area. Could you made a .dll that provides industrial strength encription for stacks? al ===== Visit my site: http://www.geocities.com/capellan2000/ Search the mail list: http://mindlube.com/cgi-bin/search-use-rev.cgi __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
