Player naturally... you play with software, music, stacks, games... anything...
A "worker" wouldn't be as much fun! An Executor would scare users a User would be ubiquitous... Remember to leave an option for nerds to remove the splash ;) > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Hurley > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 16:38 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: "Engine" versus "Player" > > > > > >Message: 12 > >Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:43:12 -1000 > >From: Sannyasin Sivakatirswami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Subject: "Engine" versus "Player" > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Cc: Kevin Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed > > > Sannyasin Sivakatirswami wrote: > > Snip > > > >Given that there will be a large percentage of IT "nerds" exposed to > >the new technology in the process... (our audience will includes LOTS > >of Indian software people and their children --most of whom have been > >"eaten alive" by MS in terms of their tool set) it seems worthy of > >some attention, and perhaps a general consensus so we might all do the > >same thing? I see Scott Rossi tending toward "Player..." > > > Sannyasin, > > This is very interesting to me. I have been anxious waiting for the > "Player" for some time. > > But it appears that you have effectively made your own. How exactly > does this work? > > Jim > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
