> > If you like, you can look at my XML Library, which is done > totally in > > Transcript. The docs are really clear about XML and how the > library is > > used. > > -- before I study using your flavor of xml, how is better > or different from > rrxml?
RR's XML is done with a DLL, was written in C++ (I believe) and supports SOAP and DTDs. The documentation is what you have in the Transcript Dictionary and the SOAP examples. My XML Library is done in pure Transcript and the documentation is included. No DLLs need to be used, and if you get the Standard version, you can tweak the XML parsing to your heart's content to make custom decisions based on certain tags (if you like). Main difference is that the RR XML DLL is faster and does more, but is not as flexible or well documented as my library. HTH, Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
